Updating search results...

Search Resources

2 Results

View
Selected filters:
  • Nature Communications
Impact of genetic background and experimental reproducibility on identifying chemical compounds with robust longevity effects
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating
0.0 stars

Limiting the debilitating consequences of ageing is a major medical challenge of our time. Robust pharmacological interventions that promote healthy ageing across diverse genetic backgrounds may engage conserved longevity pathways. Here we report results from the Caenorhabditis Intervention Testing Program in assessing longevity variation across 22 Caenorhabditis strains spanning 3 species, using multiple replicates collected across three independent laboratories. Reproducibility between test sites is high, whereas individual trial reproducibility is relatively low. Of ten pro-longevity chemicals tested, six significantly extend lifespan in at least one strain. Three reported dietary restriction mimetics are mainly effective across C. elegans strains, indicating species and strain-specific responses. In contrast, the amyloid dye ThioflavinT is both potent and robust across the strains. Our results highlight promising pharmacological leads and demonstrate the importance of assessing lifespans of discrete cohorts across repeat studies to capture biological variation in the search for reproducible ageing interventions.

Subject:
Biology
Life Science
Material Type:
Reading
Provider:
Nature Communications
Author:
Anna B. Crist
Anna C. Foulger
Anna L. Coleman-Hulbert
Brian Onken
Carolina Ibanez-Ventoso
Christina Chang
Christine A. Sedore
Daniel Edgar
Dipa Bhaumik
Elizabeth A. Chao
Erik Johnson
Esteban Chen
Girish Harinath
Gordon J. Lithgow
Jailynn Harke
Jason L Kish
Jian Xue
John H. Willis
June Hope
Kathleen J. Dumas
Manish Chamoli
Mark Lucanic
Mary Anne Royal
Max Guo
Michael P. Presley
Michelle K. Chen
Monica Driscoll
Patrick C. Phillips
Shaunak Kamat
Shobhna Patel
Suzanne Angeli
Suzhen Guo
Theo Garrett
W. Todd Plummer
Date Added:
08/07/2020
The effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals
Unrestricted Use
CC BY
Rating
0.0 stars

To increase transparency in science, some scholarly journals are publishing peer review reports. But it is unclear how this practice affects the peer review process. Here, we examine the effect of publishing peer review reports on referee behavior in five scholarly journals involved in a pilot study at Elsevier. By considering 9,220 submissions and 18,525 reviews from 2010 to 2017, we measured changes both before and during the pilot and found that publishing reports did not significantly compromise referees’ willingness to review, recommendations, or turn-around times. Younger and non-academic scholars were more willing to accept to review and provided more positive and objective recommendations. Male referees tended to write more constructive reports during the pilot. Only 8.1% of referees agreed to reveal their identity in the published report. These findings suggest that open peer review does not compromise the process, at least when referees are able to protect their anonymity.

Subject:
Applied Science
Information Science
Material Type:
Reading
Provider:
Nature Communications
Author:
Bahar Mehmani
Emilia López-Iñesta
Flaminio Squazzoni
Francisco Grimaldo
Giangiacomo Bravo
Date Added:
08/07/2020