(This case study was added to OER Commons as one of a …
(This case study was added to OER Commons as one of a batch of over 700. It has relevant information which may include medical imagery, lab results, and history where relevant. A link to the final diagnosis can be found at the end of the case study for review. The first paragraph of the case study -- typically, but not always the clinical presentation -- is provided below.)
A male newborn was delivered at gestational age 37 weeks and 1 day via spontaneous vaginal delivery. His teenage mother was G1P1 and received routine antenatal care. His mother's blood type was A- (for which Rhogam treatment was received) and her pregnancy was complicated by preeclampsia.
(This case study was added to OER Commons as one of a …
(This case study was added to OER Commons as one of a batch of over 700. It has relevant information which may include medical imagery, lab results, and history where relevant. A link to the final diagnosis can be found at the end of the case study for review. The first paragraph of the case study -- typically, but not always the clinical presentation -- is provided below.)
An elderly, Caucasian, postmenopausal female presented for her annual gynecological examination. Her main complaint was a three day history of rectal pressure, one month prior to presentation. Significantly, her previous pap smear (two years ago) was negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy. She denied having any abdominal pain or distension, early satiety, change in bowel or bladder habits, and no vaginal symptoms. On bimanual examination, she was noted to have a posterior uterine mass. Subsequent pelvic ultrasound revealed a thickened endometrial lining of 21.2mm, and a complex left adnexal, solid cystic mass measuring 13.9x7.3x10.5cm with thick/thin septations and a solid component with vascular flow. An elective left salpingo-oophorectomy was performed.
No restrictions on your remixing, redistributing, or making derivative works. Give credit to the author, as required.
Your remixing, redistributing, or making derivatives works comes with some restrictions, including how it is shared.
Your redistributing comes with some restrictions. Do not remix or make derivative works.
Most restrictive license type. Prohibits most uses, sharing, and any changes.
Copyrighted materials, available under Fair Use and the TEACH Act for US-based educators, or other custom arrangements. Go to the resource provider to see their individual restrictions.
