In which John Green previews the new Crash Course on Navigating Digital …
In which John Green previews the new Crash Course on Navigating Digital Information! We've partnered with MediaWise, The Poynter Institute, and The Stanford History Education Group to teach a course in hands-on skills to evaluate the information you read online. The internet is full of information, a lot of it notably wrong. We're here to arm you with the skills to separate the good stuff from the inaccurate stuff and browse the internet with confidence.
Special thanks to our partners from MediaWise who helped create this series: The Poynter Institute The Stanford History Education Group (sheg.stanford.edu)
Combined with the three other modules bearing the same name, students will …
Combined with the three other modules bearing the same name, students will learn what is trustworthy on the internet. This module focuses on the credibility of websites based on who created it, when it was created/updated, and why it was created. After students go through a station rotation on the subject, they will create a checklist, in small groups, that will help peers understand which sources to trust on the internet.
This freshman course explores the scientific publication cycle, primary vs. secondary sources, …
This freshman course explores the scientific publication cycle, primary vs. secondary sources, and online and in-print bibliographic databases; how to search, find, evaluate, and cite information; indexing and abstracting; using special resources (e.g. patents) and “grey literature” (e.g. technical reports and conference proceedings); conducting Web searches; and constructing literature reviews.
For each essential standard, open the unwrapped document and check off the …
For each essential standard, open the unwrapped document and check off the items as your team completes the vetting process. Once all essential standards have been vetted, each team member should sign (electronically) at the bottom of the page to confirm their acceptance of the curriculum and OER.
A form for evaluating OER materials based on Content, Accessibility, and Pedagogy. …
A form for evaluating OER materials based on Content, Accessibility, and Pedagogy. Statements are arranged in rubric style allowing for efficiency in the review process, while requiring narrative information to document the statements. Items are rated according to the mandated scale in Utah: Recommended Primary, Recommended Limited, Recommended Teacher Resource, Recommended Student Resource, Reviewed not Recommended, Not Sampled, Not Reviewed.
No restrictions on your remixing, redistributing, or making derivative works. Give credit to the author, as required.
Your remixing, redistributing, or making derivatives works comes with some restrictions, including how it is shared.
Your redistributing comes with some restrictions. Do not remix or make derivative works.
Most restrictive license type. Prohibits most uses, sharing, and any changes.
Copyrighted materials, available under Fair Use and the TEACH Act for US-based educators, or other custom arrangements. Go to the resource provider to see their individual restrictions.
